January-Febraury 2006

  • 1
  • 2

Tires and Tracks: Finding What Works Best

Five contractors explain their earthmoving projects.

Article Tools

Create a Link to this Article

By Daniel C. Brown

Comments

Tires and tracks both have their place, depending on the soil conditions of the project. On some earthmoving projects, scrapers work well, but other times the ground is just too wet for them. The tires sink in, rolling resistance goes up, and your load count goes down. It’s time to reload and try something else.

That was the case for North Pine Aggregate Inc. when working the site last season for a housing project in Otsego, MN. The project called for moving nearly 2 million cubic yards of earth, and North Pine owner Dennis Jensen had bid it as a scraper project. “We’re mostly a scraper-oriented company,” he says.

On the Otsego job, he says the firm started out with scrapers but had to pull them out because the wet, expansive clay soil bogged down the big twin-engine machines. “So we brought in excavators, articulated trucks, and wide pad dozers,” says Jensen. “It was wet, fat clay.” His equipment of choice: two Komatsu PC600 excavators, two Caterpillar 345B excavators, and at the peak, 10 articulated trucks—six John Deere 40-ton units and four Volvo A40C trucks. A mixture of John Deere and Caterpillar dozers rounded out the fleet.

“I bid it as a scraper job, and we had pretty good scraper money on it,” says Jensen. “But it was more costly to move with the trucks, because the load count was down so much. It was about a break-even project for us.”

Two of the excavators stripped topsoil and made cuts. “And if there was a fill nearby, we would throw it over and place it with the wide pad dozers,” says Jensen. Two of the excavators loaded trucks; hauls ranged up to 2,500 feet.

The clay was so wet that North Pine had to “farm it” to dry it out. “We had disks going steadily,” Jensen recalls. “We had two John Deere 9400 four-wheel-drive tractors pulling 36-inch offset disks. When we could, we would put the wetter stuff back into a borrow area where we didn’t have to meet compaction specs.

“The dozers worked well,” he says. “We used them a lot making cuts and fills. We would push a lot of the dirt up to 300 feet because it was so hard to get around with the haul units.”

By contrast, scrapers proved to be the answer on a 1.5-million-cubic-yard job that North Pine did in Rogers, MN. “At the peak we had eight Caterpillar 637E scrapers and two 627G units,” says Jensen. “The average haul was 1,200 to 1,400 feet. It was sandy clay—nice stuff to work with.

“We push-pulled the scrapers,” he says. “No push dozers were necessary.” The job did require a number of dozers to strip topsoil or replace it once the area was brought to grade. The dozer fleet included two Caterpillar D8R machines, one Cat D9R, and two Cat D6RXL units. One Cat 815 compactor completed the fleet.

So how was production? “We bid it for 100 loads per day per scraper,” says Jensen. “We actually had a lot of days where we did 140 to 150 loads per day per machine. So on that job, scrapers were the most economical way to get it done.”

High Production
“We just finished moving 8 million cubic yards at the Pittsburgh Mills Mall,” says Rich Doyle, project manager with Trumbull Corp. of Pittsburgh, PA. “Clearing started in April 2003, and dirt moving began that July. We had our first 4 million by November 2003, and the other 4 million by July 2004.

PHOTO: TRUMBULL

“Working double 10-hour shifts, we moved the first 4 million in four months—1 million yards a month,” says Doyle. “They needed the first 4 million completed so that they could start the building in November 2003. It’s a very large mall.”

About half of the job consisted of sandstone. Another quarter of it was shale and a clay-shale blend. The remainder was dirt. “We blasted 6 million yards of the 8 million,” says Doyle.

For Trumbull, it was a $31 million project that included earthmoving, drainage, sanitary lines, and a utility package. The contractor attacked the earthmoving job with two huge Caterpillar 5110 excavators, a Cat 992G wheel loader, eight Cat 777 rigid-frame trucks, one Cat 773 truck, and two 50-ton Payhauler trucks. The big Cat excavators had 10-cubic-yard buckets. Yet another equipment spread added a Caterpillar 365 excavator and four Volvo A35 articulated trucks. Five Cat D8-size dozers, two D9 dozers, one D10, and two Cat 16G blades rounded out the fleet.

“You wouldn’t get much production out of scrapers in that sandstone, blasted or not,” says Doyle. “You can’t load them. You get 2-foot and 3-foot pieces, and you’ve got to push them 300 feet to load them.

“That said, you probably could have done half that job with scrapers,” he adds. “A lot of the shales and clay shales could have been done with scrapers. But we don’t own any scrapers.”

PHOTO: TRUMBULL

At the mall, the deepest cut was about 150 feet, and the biggest fill also measured about 150 feet. The two big Cat excavators and the wheel loader filled about 180 loads in a 10-hour day. “We got between 180 and 200 loads a day, depending on the material we were in,” says Doyle.

Advertisement

Meanwhile the Cat 365 excavator, fitted with a 5-cubic-yard bucket, worked the ponds and the smaller cuts—the low-production dirt. That spread could move about 2,500 yards a day—200 to 250 yards an hour.

Next Page >

  • 1
  • 2

What Do You Think?

Post a Comment

Be the first to tell us what you think!

Post a Comment

Not a subscriber? Sign Up
 
 
*  
 




 

Get GX Contractor Email Updates!

Get weekly news and updates through our GX Contractor email newsletter!